Shame on the New York Times. Shame.

Estimated 650K fans cheer on Pens at parade for Stanley Cup win
June 15, 2017
ANGER OF THE SURVIVORS Sadiq Khan confronted by young boy as he faces furious crowd demanding answers at Grenfell Tower scene
June 16, 2017

Shame on the New York Times. Shame.

National Review

Its editorial about yesterday’s shooting doesn’t just twist the truth; it may be libelous. The New York Times published its editorial in response to yesterday’s vicious, violent, and explicitly political attack on Congressional Republicans — an attack that wounded four and left Representative Steve Scalise in critical condition in a Washington-area hospital — and it is abhorrent. It is extraordinarily cruel, vicious, and — above all — dishonest. The editorial doesn’t just twist the truth to advance the board’s preferred narratives; it may even be libelous, a term I choose carefully.

Yesterday’s shooter, James Hodgkinson, left little doubt as to his political leanings and his political motivations. He was a vocal Bernie Sanders supporter, belonged to Facebook groups with names such as “Terminate the Republican Party” and “The Road to Hell is paved with Republicans,” and he was constantly sharing angry anti-GOP messages and memes. Before opening fire, he reportedly asked whether the players on the baseball field were Democrats or Republicans. In other words, all available signs point to an act of lone-wolf progressive political terror.

How does the Times deal with this evil act? The editorial begins innocently enough, describing the shooting and even forthrightly outlining Hodgkinson’s politics.  But then, the board says this — and it’s worth quoting at length: Read more

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *